Middle East Eye Article RatingJudges cite failed Israel deal in ruling UK-Rwanda deportation policy unlawful
- Bias Rating
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : The appeal was brought by 10 asylum seekers from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Albania and Vietnam, as well as the charity Asylum Aid.44% : In a deal that was not made public at the time, Israel reportedly offered asylum seekers a choice between being detained in Israel or being given $3,500 and face removal to Rwanda, where they could theoretically attempt to seek asylum.
40% : Bottinick added that UNHCR staff had heard senior government officials make statements to the effect that "asylum seekers from the Middle East and Afghanistan should claim asylum in their own region".UNHCR went as far as to suggest that Rwanda likely held a bias against asylum seekers in the Middle East and Afghanistan.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.