Justices appear skeptical of New York gun permit law's requirements

Nov 03, 2021 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    32% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -44% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    76% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : Sonia Sotomayor , another liberal-leaning justice on the bench, later contended that history itself does not paint Second Amendment rights with a broad brush.
52% : Still, both the attorney's clients have already passed required background checks for gun licenses for hunting and target practice, Clement said, arguing the law attempts "to convert a fundamental constitutional right into a privilege."
52% : "We don't quarrel at all with the notion that the Second Amendment has something to say outside the home," said DOJ attorney Brian Fletcher.
50% : And that is why the licensing officer is meant to take into account not just the risk, but also the population and the availability of law enforcement."
48% : The Second Amendment case on Wednesday represents a pickup from where the court stood over 10 years ago in the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller decision, in which justices ruled 5-4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to harbor a gun in a residence for self-defense.
46% : Liberal justices such as Stephen Breyer first sought to poke holes in the would-be arguments of novel conservative court justices, noting professors of history make contradicting arguments related to gun rights history.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link