Conservative News Article Rating

Justice Thomas does not hold back in concurring opinion to overturning Roe v Wade, leftists sure to explode

Jun 25, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    90% Very Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    96% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    10% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : In a solo concurring opinion appearing on page 117 of the explosive decision, Justice Thomas took a closer look at the Due Process Clause, previously used to support the notion that abortion is a Constitutionally-protected right.
41% : It does not, as the Court's substantive due process cases suppose, 'forbi[d] the government to infringe certain "fundamental" liberty interests at all, no matter what process is provided.'""Because the Due Process Clause does not secure any substantive rights," explained Thomas, "it does not secure a right to abortion."
41% :Thomas stressed that the Court was not asked to weigh in on the Fourteenth Amendment or on the application of the Due Process Clause "in other, specific contexts," and the decision to reverse Roe v. Wade should not "cast doubt" on any precedents "that do not concern abortion."
39% : As American Wire News reported, the Supreme Court ruled Friday on Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, a case which called into question Mississippi's right to ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
39% : "I join the opinion of the Court because it correctly holds that there is no constitutional right to abortion," he wrote.
39% : "It's clear the Court's assault on fundamental rights will not stop with abortion," tweeted woke advocate Kimberlé Crenshaw.
38% :These rulings, as many on Twitter are already pointing out, protect contraception, same-sex sex, and same-sex marriage.
38% : The Court well explains why, under our substantive due process precedents, the purported right to abortion is not a form of 'liberty' protected by the Due Process Clause.
30% : In a critical part of the ruling, the Court stated, "The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion: Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link