Kamala's canned debate answers wowed the media -- but didn't...
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
36% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-15% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
7% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
83% : She's going to do all these wonderful things," Trump stated.65% : Meanwhile, CNN's post-debate poll showed Trump expanding a big lead on the question of which candidate can handle the economy best.
53% : But after the debate, as many in the media swooned over their commanding new queen, a funny thing happened: Polls and focus groups emerged showing her winning on style points, but Trump winning on substance.
49% : Six of them said they had chosen to vote for Trump, while just three said Harris' performance had swayed them.
43% : Before Tuesday's matchup, Trump led by 18 percentage points on this No.1 issue; afterward, it grew to a 20-point margin.
24% : "Harris dominated Trump in debate, but will it matter?" was The Washington Post's take.
23% : "Harris Dominates as Trump Gets Defensive" was the lead headline in The New York Times.
13% : The hopelessly biased David Muir and Linsey Davis obliged and then some, fact-checking Trump five times without correcting the veep even once -- despite her repeated lies, as dutifully documented by The Post.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.