TMZKeith Olbermann Calls BS on Trump's Doctor, Claims He Wasn't Shot
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-54% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
85% : Which is perfect, because Trump wasn't hit by a bullet.31% : The narrative changed almost immediately when the official word came out ... that Trump was grazed in the ear by an errant bullet, and had he not turned his head he would have been dead.
27% : "It's relevant information -- whether Trump was shot or hit by glass -- but it doesn't diminish the fact he was the target of an assassination attempt.
26% : Trump was hit by pieces of glass that had shattered during the gunfire.
8% : Jackson evaluated Trump Saturday, saying Trump was hit by a bullet in the right ear with Thomas Crooks' high-powered rifle.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.