Lawfare against Donald Trump is approaching a new and dangerous phase
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-35% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
12% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : If Trump can't post the bond by Monday, she may take them.52% : --I cannot keep emphasizing this point enough: yes, Trump overstated the value of his assets when he sought these construction loans.
46% : TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/I assumed the adults would step in once the kids had had their fun putting Trump through the wringer, because the case was so obviously politically motivated.
45% : I assumed the adults would step in once the kids had had their fun putting Trump through the wringer, because the case was so obviously politically motivated.
41% : It turns out Trump does not have $500 million lying around to post a bond, which is a requirement for him to appeal the case.
29% : I am trying to find an understandable analogy for the basis of the case against Trump, the crime he is supposed to have committed.
28% : I figured a higher court would quickly reverse Judge Arthur Engoron's verdict, or at least that New York attorney general Letitia James would ensure Trump could appeal.
28% : I figured a higher court would quickly reverse Judge Arthur Engoron's verdict, or at least that New York attorney general Letitia James would ensure Trump could appeal.
24% : I never thought New York state would seriously try to enforce the absurd $464 million judgment against Trump for his "crime" of borrowing money and paying it back.
22% : Here is how the Associated Press reported on Engeron's initial ruing against Trump last September:Judge Arthur Engoron, ruling in a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, found that Trump and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork used in making deals and securing loans...Nowhere - NOWHERE - in the story did the AP acknowledge that Trump had repaid all the loans with interest.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.