Lawyers spar in Supreme Court over constitutional rights in transgender health care case

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : He wrote the Bostock opinion, which held that an employer treating a worker differently based on sexual orientation or gender identity was acting on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII.
49% : Four years ago, Roberts surprised some observers by joining the court's opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protected employees on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
40% : "Nine years ago, in Obergefell v. Hodges, Roberts wrote the principal dissent to the court's decision that the 14th Amendment guarantees a right of same-sex marriage.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.