AlterNetLegal expert makes conservative 'originalist' case against 'insurrectionist' Trump
- Bias Rating
-86% Very Liberal
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
1% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : READ MORE:Experts fear 'violence and chaos' if Supreme Court blocks Trump from election ballotIn an article published on February 5, The Guardian's David Smith stresses that Habig, by using "originalist" arguments, is giving the Roberts Court a "taste of their own medicine.28% : Some of the proponents of disqualifying Trump because of Section 3 are conservatives, including J. Michael Luttig (a retired former federal judge).
26% : Habig has filed an amicus brief on behalf of historians David Blight and Jill Lepore, who, in Trump v. Anderson, are arguing that Section 3 disqualifies Trump from the 2024 presidential election.
8% : In Trump v. Anderson, the U.S. Supreme will evaluate whether the Colorado Supreme Court was right or wrong when it excluded 2024 GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump from the state's election ballot based on Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.