Letters to the editor for Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : Seems we were doing quite well as a country under Trump.
58% : "Trump pardoned his son-in-law's father and now made him ambassador to France!
53% : Trump refused to attend Biden's inauguration, even though outgoing presidents have graciously done that down through our nation's history.
45% : It appears that the actual reason for voting for Trump, but they didn't want to say it, was that they wanted an autocrat whose favorite world leaders are also autocrats, Vladimir Putin (Communist), Kim Jung Un (Communist), and Xi Jin Ping (Communist), among others.
41% : What is truly astounding is that these same people on the Left suggest that Trump will use the DOJ to go after political opponents, when the facts are clear that it is exactly what they are doing to him.
40% : And don't forget, Trump was telling his followers back in July that if they voted for him in November, they would never need to vote again.
31% : The writer suggests that the Democrats are sore losers and did not accept a loss to Trump graciously.
29% : It also seems that "critical thinking skills" are in very short supply among the 56% of the American electorate (66% in SWFL) whose primary claim for voting for Trump was the lousy economy under Biden.
29% : First, Kamala Harris called Trump and congratulated and conceded to him shortly after the election was called.
29% : But he repeatedly said he would not, only because he was the candidate at that time and didn't want it to be used against him by Trump.
28% : Trump has good reason to not trust them to do an unbiased job and it is understandable that he is not using them for background checks.
26% : He wrote the book!Gloria Kauls, EsteroMany on the Left are making a big deal out of the issue that Trump is not using the FBI for background checks on his appointments.
24% : He was removed from presidential consideration after his first debate with Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.