
Medicaid expansion cost $1 trillion, double the estimate -- Harris...
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : That bill, which would restrict the ability of able-bodied adults without young children to access Medicaid, would save $240 billion over the next decade, our analysis found -- as people leave Medicaid for productive work and the superior private coverage that usually comes with it.47% : It remains the Democratic Party's template for health-care reform, including Harris' since-reversed 2019 promise to enact "Medicare for All.
47% : Her party opposes work requirements, and she'd likely push the 10 holdout states to expand Medicaid, perhaps forcing their hand through legislation or regulation.
47% : We estimate this would cost at least another $670 billion over a 10-year span, adding another 11 million able-bodied adults to Medicaid.
42% : If Trump brought back his work requirements in a second term, dozens of states would likely enact them.
41% : If Harris pushes for more sweeping health-care changes -- say, bringing back her earlier support for Medicare for All -- she'll cause even worse taxpayer pain.
40% : They're competing with the truly needy Americans who Medicaid was designed to help, leading to longer wait times and worse health outcomes in many cases.
21% : Taxpayers need the return of Donald Trump's health-care policies: Under a President Harris, they can only expect a worsening health-care crisis -- one that undermines America's fiscal soundness, economic strength, and the well-being of the very people Medicaid is supposed to help.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.