Medicaid expansion cost $1 trillion, double the estimate -- Harris...
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : That bill, which would restrict the ability of able-bodied adults without young children to access Medicaid, would save $240 billion over the next decade, our analysis found -- as people leave Medicaid for productive work and the superior private coverage that usually comes with it.47% : It remains the Democratic Party's template for health-care reform, including Harris' since-reversed 2019 promise to enact "Medicare for All.
47% : Her party opposes work requirements, and she'd likely push the 10 holdout states to expand Medicaid, perhaps forcing their hand through legislation or regulation.
47% : We estimate this would cost at least another $670 billion over a 10-year span, adding another 11 million able-bodied adults to Medicaid.
42% : If Trump brought back his work requirements in a second term, dozens of states would likely enact them.
41% : If Harris pushes for more sweeping health-care changes -- say, bringing back her earlier support for Medicare for All -- she'll cause even worse taxpayer pain.
40% : They're competing with the truly needy Americans who Medicaid was designed to help, leading to longer wait times and worse health outcomes in many cases.
21% : Taxpayers need the return of Donald Trump's health-care policies: Under a President Harris, they can only expect a worsening health-care crisis -- one that undermines America's fiscal soundness, economic strength, and the well-being of the very people Medicaid is supposed to help.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.