Missouri Ignores Pleas From Senators and Pope to Execute Intellectually Disabled Black Man Ernest Johnson
- Bias Rating
-44% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-52% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
38% : Johnson had won previous stays of execution after his lawyers argued that a 2008 surgery to remove a brain tumor left him intellectually disabled and that a lethal injection would cause violent seizures before he died.34% : On Tuesday, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh also denied his final plea for a stay of execution by writ of certiorari, or full review of his case.
29% : Pope Francis and a number of U.S. senators and advocacy groups, including the ACLU of Missouri, Missouri Catholic Conference, Missourians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, also unsuccessfully petitioned Missouri Gov. Mike Parson to stop the execution.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.