The Guardian Article RatingMonday briefing: Who was really to blame for trouble on Armistice Day
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Mark Townsend has covered four of the pro-Palestinian marches since 7 October - a role which, this weekend, also meant covering the far-right counter-protest.41% : There were 145 arrests after the pro-Palestinian march and far right counter-protest in London on Saturday, and all but a handful were at the latter.
40% : The counter-protest first appeared 750 words in, in a sentence suggesting that the protest organisers "ought to take some part of the responsibility".
38% : "The counter-protest: 'They were looking for a fight'There was no sense, in contrast, of a moderate mainstream to the counter-protest, which was almost exclusively made up of white men who appeared to have come to London in search of trouble.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.