Movement to Abolish the Education Department, Decades in the Making, Lives On
- Bias Rating
98% Very Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-13% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Under the proposal, public charters seeking federal money would have to prove that their neighboring district schools are "over-enrolled," which would be impossible since public schools have been losing students nationwide because of the COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns.56% :The largest portion of the department's K-12 budget goes to what's known as Title I, which supplements state and local education funding for children from needy households.
56% :"Charter schools have incentives to do a good job, because their customers aren't residentially assigned to them like most government-run schools," DeAnglis said, noting that the very existence of those schools, which typically hire non-unionized teachers, challenge the teachers' unions' monopoly on the teaching profession.
48% :The United States had no federal department devoted exclusively to education for nearly 200 years until October 1979, when a Democrat-majority Congress narrowly passed a bill to create a stand-alone cabinet-level bureaucracy out of the existing Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
47% :Proponents of the federal intervention in education cite the "spending clause" of the Constitution, which authorizes Congress to raise taxes and spend money to provide for the general welfare.
44% : "This is another good argument for abolishing the department: Why should the Biden administration be able to protect the status quo teacher' union's monopoly at the expense of parents by regulating the teachers' unions' competition, which happens to be the charter schools?"
37% : Still, critics warn that these priorities leave the DOE a potential leeway to deny funding to charter schools.
34% : Meanwhile, the DOE under President Joe Biden recently tried to tighten regulations on public charter schools, which many financially disadvantaged families rely on to get their children a high-quality education they otherwise cannot afford.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.