MSNBC staffers slam 'Morning Joe' co-hosts after Mar-a-Lago summit...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : "Joe and I realize it's time to do something different, and that starts with not only talking about Donald Trump, but also talking with him," she added, noting that Trump was "cheerful and upbeat" during the private meeting, and seemed "interested in finding common ground" with Democrats.
55% : "The summit was the first time the pair had seen the incoming president in seven years, Brzezinski said.Trump later told Fox News Digital that the meeting with the lefty morning show co-hosts was "extremely cordial" and lamented "that it wasn't done long ago."
32% : The same employee told the outlet that MSNBC staff members had become "largely disdainful" of the left-wing network hosts in light of the news, calling them "opportunistic" for arranging to meet with Trump after spending two years demonizing him as the second coming of Adolf Hitler.
29% : The co-hosts -- who married in 2018 -- also drew swift condemnation from outside the network, with some accusing the talking heads of grasping at ratings with their abrupt about-face, which followed more than two years of fomenting fear about Trump on a daily basis.
21% : MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin called the meeting "disgusting" on Bluesky, the social media platform attracting disaffected liberals who claim to be leaving Elon Musk-owned X.Katie Phang, host of the network's "The Katie Phang Show," made an oblique reference on X to the hosts' visit, writing, "Normalizing Trump is a bad idea.
3% : Joe and Mika who constantly attack 'fascist' Trump on their show, went to Mar a Lago to talk with Trump over the weekend," said another.Scarborough, 61, attempted to defend what many called abject hypocrisy, saying, "Don't be mistaken, we are not here to defend or normalize Donald Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.