MSNBC Trots Out Life-Sized Liberal Buckets of Tears Griswold, Tribe to Bash SCOTUS
- Bias Rating
88% Very Conservative
- Reliability
30% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
100% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-52% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : Tur responded by directly asking what she made of voters who want back Trump, but Griswold showed no such courtesy, instead praising those who've "have stepped up to safeguard American democracy" and called on them to save "our fundamental freedoms" like "[t]he idea that women should have control over our own bodies" and "democracy should remain in tact".39% : After Tur praised the three liberal justices for implicitly labeling Trump "an oathbreaking insurrectionist" and Tribe ripped the Court for "drag[ging] out" the issue of presidential immunity, the pair ended with more pie-in-the-sky lunacy about the Court punting a weighty issue of presidential immunity and the Court deciding the election (click "expand"):TRIBE:
24% : What you're basically saying is the country is hostage to someone who engaged in insurrection and notice nothing the Court said today denied the claim that Donald Trump did just that.
19% : Tur put her partisan thumb print on the segment form the get-go with this petty swipe at the Supreme Court by referring to Griswold as actually "elected" to her post and "says Donald Trump is still an oath breaking insurrectionist.
17% : I think the larger picture is it's as clear as day what Donald Trump did: He incited that violent mob to rush on to the Capitol to try to stop the peaceful transfer of presidential power.
17% : That's not an easy question to decide and say that she basically has to lay out a roadmap for all of the issues of presidential immunity before Donald Trump can go to trial is like saying we'll wait to hell freezes over.
16% : Sure enough, he did by attacking voters as stupid if they vote for Trump and claimed Congress would better serve Americans if it were run by people like Jamie Raskin (D-MD) (click "expand"):TUR:
15% : And what we need Donald Trump to understand is that there are losers and winners in elections.
15% : When you say remanded back to Judge Chutkan, is that to decide the scope of presidential immunity before they decide whether Donald Trump violated the law with what he did on January 6?TRIBE: -- exactly.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.