Name-calling and hyperbole: Trump continues fear-mongering fest at Georgia rally
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-17% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-41% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Despite this assertion, polls increasingly suggest that Harris may be ahead of Trump today, with the Democratic national convention coming in two weeks.49% : The contrast between Trump and Harris in the space was stark.
46% : Red Maga hats and Trump mug shots - or the now-iconic shot of his fist in the air after the assassination attempt - dominated the mostly white sea of support for Trump.
45% : "Laken's blood is on Kamala Harris's hands," Trump said, "as though she was standing there watching it herself."
42% : The refrain, repeated by speaker after speaker at the rally, was that Trump took a bullet for Republican voters, and they should return the favor with powerful turnout in Georgia.
40% : We don't need a low IQ individual," Trump said of the vice-president Kamala Harris.
27% : "Trump rattled off a set of crime statistics in Atlanta that bear no resemblance to the actual change in crime over the last two years.
27% : Before Biden's withdrawal, Trump had been consistently ahead of Biden, so much so that political discussion here had been about whether the Biden campaign would capitulate in Georgia in order to focus its resources on Rust Belt races.
25% : In long, rambling comments, Trump lambasted Brian Kemp, the governor, and Brad Raffensperger, the secretary of state, for disloyalty: "In my opinion, they want us to lose.
20% : "Trump made a point of highlighting the work of three Republican appointees to Georgia's board of elections, who have been entertaining changes to election rules that critics say are setting the stage for a legal contest in case of a Trump loss in November.
20% : Too few polls measuring Harris and Trump in Georgia have been conducted to read the race here, but both campaigns have begun treating Georgia as a battleground state once again.
19% : "Trump highlighted a handful of recent murders in the city, saying "Atlanta is like a killing field, and your governor should get off his ass and do something about it.
19% : Trump invoked the murder of Laken Riley, a college student murdered on the campus of the University of Georgia.
19% : Trump opened up his appearance in Atlanta lying about the Harris event in the same place, falsely claiming that people left the event early and that there were empty seats.
14% : Trump is trying to tie this to Harris's role as "border czar" early in the Biden administration.
14% : "Trump said, without any evidence, that "40 or 50 million illegal aliens" will enter the United States if Harris wins, he said, claiming that suburbs will be overrun with "savage foreign gangs".
6% : Of President Joe Biden and the debate that led to his withdrawal from the race, Trump said "He was choking like a dog!
5% : Trump repeatedly called Harris a "lunatic".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.