Nebraska State Sen. Mike McDonnell on tanking winner-take-all electoral vote: 'This just did not seem fair'
- Bias Rating
28% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
55% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
42% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
13% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : "The potential winner-take-all electoral change would have been pivotal if the Republican-leaning state then allocated all of its five electoral votes solely to Trump if he won statewide, instead of dividing them with Harris if she won in one of Nebraska's three congressional districts.27% : Trump on Monday thanked Pillen for attempting to "simplify the complexity" of the state's electoral map, while attacking McDonnell for opposing it, calling him a "Grandstander.""Unfortunately, a Democrat turned Republican(?)
20% : "And asked about Walz's comments and if Harris and Trump should make campaign stops in Omaha -- as well as if his own decision may have changed the outcome of the election -- McDonnell stayed away from making any predictions, but invited them both to Omaha.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.