NNPA condemns NABJ's decision to include Trump in annual panel | Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder
- Bias Rating
64% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
90% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-46% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : "To the journalists interviewing Trump, I wish them the best of luck.42% : Attiah noted that NABJ leadership did not consult her in the decision to provide Trump with a platform.
29% : It is a tragic affront to Black America for NABJ to permit Trump to spew racist lies, hatred, and fascism at an NABJ national convention.
26% : "Roland Martin, another prominent NABJ member, added that he found it troubling that no Black male journalists were invited to question Trump.
25% : Folks shouldn't assume that all the journalists interviewing Trump at NABJ aren't going to ask real questions or hold him accountable.
18% : "Prominent journalists April Ryan and Yamiche Alcindor, both of whom Trump has previously targeted, also condemned the NABJ's decision.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.