'No evidence' Trump hit by shrapnel not than bullet, former White House doctor says
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-65% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : "Top Republican leaders, as well as Trump himself, have insisted the former president's ear was wounded by a bullet at the rally.35% : "Others have praised Trump for standing up and pumping his fist after being shot.
32% : At a rally in Michigan, his first after the shooting, Trump claimed he "took a bullet for democracy.
27% : Trump has incorporated the shooting into his stump speech.
25% : During testimony Wednesday before the House Judiciary, Wray said the FBI had collected eight spent rounds from the site of the Pennsylvania rally and had accounted for each shot gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks fired at Trump.
9% : The comments come two days after FBI director Christopher Wray suggested during testimony in Congress that Trump may have been hit by shrapnel, an analysis Jackson called "wrong and inappropriate.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.