Oops, Trump's new Director of National Intelligence wasn't even smart enough to delete her tweet calling him the b-word

  • Bias Rating

    28% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    20% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    46% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    5% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

4% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

77% : Trump has nominated Tulsi Gabbard to become the next Director of National Intelligence.
66% : Now that Gabbard is to be the next DNI, she'll be working closely with Trump to ensure the country's national interests.
58% : Gabbard wasn't afraid of going toe-to-toe with the Stable Genius back in the old days, and as people on social media have pointed out, she hasn't even deleted the tweet that implicitly called Trump the b-word.
37% : Trump can bandy around insults with totalitarian dictators all he wants, but that has neither stopped them from stockpiling those nukes in the Korean Peninsula nor brought any measure of lasting conciliation in the ongoing East-West conflict.
29% : Now this track record at first glance might look like the exact opposite of what Trump needs in his new administration, but not if you consider that Gabbard officially joined the Republican Party in 2024.
26% : Trump has promised to get a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to the devastating war in Ukraine, which has already caused more than a million military and civilian casualties, but I highly doubt he's as persuasive in these matters as he thinks he is.
20% : "Considering Gabbard's long-held stance against military interventionism, it's obvious why she became disillusioned with the way the Biden administration has handled all these recent conflicts, but why she thought Trump would be any different when he is, in fact, partially responsible for the ongoing conflict between Israel and Occupied Palestine is anyone's guess.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link