Opinion: Eleanor Roosevelt's prescient grasp of AI | CNN
- Bias Rating
-66% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-30% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
14% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : UAE Minister for AI on the prospects for a global regulatory bodyEditor's Note: Linda Thomas-Greenfield is the US ambassador to the United Nations.56% : "Linda Thomas-Greenfield United States Mission to the United NationsBut the machine wasn't just winning, Roosevelt explained: it was "learning.
55% : But as the body charged with maintaining global peace, upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms, and preserving the planet we all call home, this is also exactly the kind of task the United Nations was designed for.
49% : It lays out the steps countries can take to ensure responsible governance, and protect all individuals -- including vulnerable individuals -- from discrimination, as well as the ways in which the United Nations itself can use AI to advance human rights and sustainable development.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.