Our debt ceiling crisis could hit as early as June. Here's how Biden can sidestep it.

Jan 14, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -12% Somewhat Liberal

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -14% Somewhat Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    -38% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : It included $917 billion in direct spending cuts, mostly implemented by capping "discretionary" spending, which includes defense programs and everything else the government does that isn't a mandatory entitlement program like Social Security, food stamps, or veterans' benefits.
49% : Issuing quasi-debt while the crisis plays outSteven Schwarcz, a professor at Duke Law and expert on capital markets, has proposed getting around the debt ceiling by having the Treasury Department create a "special-purpose entity" to issue new securities, distinct from traditional Treasury bonds, that can pay for government expenditures.
44% : Because the deal took cuts to Social Security, Medicaid, and the beneficiary side of Medicare off the table, the toll on Americans was lighter than it could have been.
43% : But funding for environmental protection and parks fell by 15 percent; general government operations by 26 percent; education and job training by 14 percent; diplomacy and foreign aid by 19 percent; agriculture, energy, and commerce by 19 percent.
42% : Social Security and Medicare are still hot potatoes, and while other "mandatory" programs like food stamps are less popular, Democrats have historically held firm against any cuts to them.
41% : Raising taxes without congressional authority would usurp Congress's taxing power.
41% : And while Republicans have ideological reasons to want to cut Social Security and Medicare, their older-than-average voting base, combined with those programs' overwhelming popularity, also give them reasons to avoid cuts in this area.
37% : The 2018 and 2019 budget deals under Trump increased the caps still further and barely included any offsets, driven largely by a Republican desire to restore defense spending.
22% : The Obama White House took a firm line against any deal that cut Social Security or Medicare without increasing taxes.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link