Our debt ceiling crisis could hit as early as June. Here's how Biden can sidestep it.
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-14% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : It included $917 billion in direct spending cuts, mostly implemented by capping "discretionary" spending, which includes defense programs and everything else the government does that isn't a mandatory entitlement program like Social Security, food stamps, or veterans' benefits.49% : Issuing quasi-debt while the crisis plays outSteven Schwarcz, a professor at Duke Law and expert on capital markets, has proposed getting around the debt ceiling by having the Treasury Department create a "special-purpose entity" to issue new securities, distinct from traditional Treasury bonds, that can pay for government expenditures.
44% : Because the deal took cuts to Social Security, Medicaid, and the beneficiary side of Medicare off the table, the toll on Americans was lighter than it could have been.
43% : But funding for environmental protection and parks fell by 15 percent; general government operations by 26 percent; education and job training by 14 percent; diplomacy and foreign aid by 19 percent; agriculture, energy, and commerce by 19 percent.
42% : Social Security and Medicare are still hot potatoes, and while other "mandatory" programs like food stamps are less popular, Democrats have historically held firm against any cuts to them.
41% : Raising taxes without congressional authority would usurp Congress's taxing power.
41% : And while Republicans have ideological reasons to want to cut Social Security and Medicare, their older-than-average voting base, combined with those programs' overwhelming popularity, also give them reasons to avoid cuts in this area.
37% : The 2018 and 2019 budget deals under Trump increased the caps still further and barely included any offsets, driven largely by a Republican desire to restore defense spending.
22% : The Obama White House took a firm line against any deal that cut Social Security or Medicare without increasing taxes.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.