Port: Burgum's flattery campaign doesn't land him what he wanted
- Bias Rating
34% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-32% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : I just don't think civic motivations were at the top of Burgum's list of priorities for his brown-nosing campaign with Trump.31% : Some have suggested that Trump might be sending Gaetz up as a sacrificial lamb, allowing the Senate to "Bork" him, and simultaneously making his other picks, like RFK, or Gabbard, or Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth look more palatable by comparison.
29% : What ever else you want to say about Trump, he's not a subtle man.
27% : Maybe, though the context of Burgum's interminable toadying to Trump since he quit his own presidential campaign last year is difficult to ignore.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.