'Preposterous': Vance Blasts ABC Over 'Abortion Ban' Myth and Other Distractions
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
82% : Whatever the opportunity costs that choice may have had, Vance is proving himself adept as a wingman for Trump in the media scrum, and that's perhaps the biggest role that a running mate can play.40% : Both are fair takeaways, too; Trump played along with the moderators on this and some other questions too much rather than challenge the assumptions and biases on which they were based.
35% : It would have been better had Trump given this response in the debate, granted.
15% : Trump had just finished arguing that the matter of abortion was best left to the states, when Linsey Davis decided to argue Harris' point for her:FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD
14% : Harris had claimed that Trump would push for a national abortion ban if elected president, a position he has repeatedly denied.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.