Project 2025 remains nonpartisan, true to 1980s good-gov't inception despite raucous outcry, key figures say
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-25% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-11% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Groves pushed back on the idea that Project 2025 or its book were intentionally geared toward Trump.35% : In the 2024 cycle, he said, Heritage offered Project 2025 materials to every candidate or prospective candidate in the 2022-2023 timeframe, including Biden, Trump, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. "President Biden did not respond, but if he responded, I would have personally gone over to the White House very happily, not sarcastically, and offered him a briefing," Roberts said.
34% : CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Roberts also spoke to right-wing concerns about the project, including the high-profile condemnation from Trump - as many of the authors of Project 2025, like Navarro, were former administration officials, while others like Lassman were not.
26% : "The project is really candidate-agnostic - so it's been interesting to see commentary ranging from 'This is specific to Trump' to 'It's not specific to Trump enough.
7% : President Donald Trump has also criticized the latest iteration and denied any involvement in its formation: "I disagree with some of the things they're saying, and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal," Trump said last month.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.