Project 2025 remains nonpartisan, true to 1980s good-gov't inception despite raucous outcry, key figures say
- Bias Rating
86% Very Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-25% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-11% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Groves pushed back on the idea that Project 2025 or its book were intentionally geared toward Trump.35% : In the 2024 cycle, he said, Heritage offered Project 2025 materials to every candidate or prospective candidate in the 2022-2023 timeframe, including Biden, Trump, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr."President Biden did not respond, but if he responded, I would have personally gone over to the White House very happily, not sarcastically, and offered him a briefing," Roberts said.
34% : CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPRoberts also spoke to right-wing concerns about the project, including the high-profile condemnation from Trump - as many of the authors of Project 2025, like Navarro, were former administration officials, while others like Lassman were not.
26% : "The project is really candidate-agnostic - so it's been interesting to see commentary ranging from 'This is specific to Trump' to 'It's not specific to Trump enough.
7% : President Donald Trump has also criticized the latest iteration and denied any involvement in its formation: "I disagree with some of the things they're saying, and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal," Trump said last month.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.