Prop. 1 on Abortion Could Cost Millions, Jeopardize Care for Mothers

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : Let's assume that the most broad interpretation, that it allows abortion right up to a second before birth.
50% : According to AbortionClinics.org, which explains the procedure as much more involved than earlier procedures, just in case you wondered what they actually do (I'll only provide the first, less grisly part):Abortion After 27 Weeks California.
42% : There is no residency requirement for abortion in California.
41% : The bill would prohibit using the coroner's statements on the certificate of fetal death to establish, bring, or support a criminal prosecution or civil cause of damages against a person who is immune from liability based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, or who aids a pregnant person in exercising their rights under the Reproductive Privacy Act, as specified.
39% :A controversy has erupted over how much Proposition 1, which if enacted Nov. 8 would put a right to abortion in the California Constitution, might cost state taxpayers if enacted.
36% : The initiative was put on the ballot by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature after the U.S. Supreme Court last June overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationally.
36% : Critics have charged AB 2223 would legalize infanticide, because no inquiries could be made by law enforcement if a post-birth baby was killed.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.