Readers sound off on replacement theory, eaten pets lies and the Brooklyn Bridge

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

53% : As an "objective referee," you scored Trump the winner of the debate by "an exceptionally large margin."
44% : At this point, nothing matters -- absolutely nothing -- except defeating Trump.
31% : Since Trump's presidency, its agenda has married with the religious right by ending same-sex marriage, banning abortion, and denying the existence of trans people.
30% : Trump even went into the spin room afterwards to try and clean things up.
29% : One could make the argument that Trump is behaving like the part of the female anatomy that he bragged to Billy Bush about grabbing.
28% : This false claim against immigrants who legally moved to Springfield to work is proof that Trump must not become president ever again.
18% : As usual, Trump gets wrong the analogy about a fighter who lost wanting a rematch.
14% : During the presidential debate that he lost to Vice President Harris, Trump pushed the envelope of hate to intentionally spread the outright racist, anti-immigrant lie that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were catching and eating neighborhood pets -- dogs and cats.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.