Reject Biden's hysteria-based climate and energy mandates. Here's the sensible way forward

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

46% : Last year, the Supreme Court categorically rejected this sleight-of-hand in West Virginia v. EPA, ruling that an agency claiming authority to compel such a major change in an industry must point to "something more than a merely plausible textual basis," but rather "point to 'clear congressional authorization' for the power it claims."
43% : As in that case EPA can show no such authorization.
43% : Anyway, the faster EV adoption targeted by EPA would have no appreciable impact on global emissions.
25% : EPA tried this ploy under President Obama when it claimed its power to regulate emissions from fossil-fuel plants allowed it to force utilities to shift to new plants using different technology.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.