Religious Liberty, Exceptions, and Targeting | National Review

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

69% : It's a questionable reading of Masterpiece: Why would the First Amendment apply differently to adjudicators from legislators?
57% : When a law isn't generally applicable, then the Court applies strict scrutiny: The government has to have an especially compelling justification for the law; otherwise it's a violation of the First Amendment.
47% : It said that if the government offers exceptions from a rule but doesn't offer them to religious parties, the Court will apply strict scrutiny -- a tough standard to protect religious liberty and scrutinize the government policy.
39% : In Fulton, the city of Philadelphia said that a Catholic adoption and foster-care agency violated the city's nondiscrimination policy by objecting to placing children with same-sex couples.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.