SCOTUS to Decide Free Speech vs Anti-Discrimination - Liberty Nation

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

62% : Forced or compelled speech is the same as banned speech as far as the First Amendment is concerned.
52% : Perhaps now the Court will clear up whether it has instituted a new jurisprudence, one sublimating the free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to non-discrimination considerations for same-sex couples.
51% : The Court agreed to take this case to answer the question "Whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment."
50% : She said on Feb. 22, after the Court agreed to hear her case, "I have been hoping and praying for this day for many, many years," and "my case is important to all Americans including artists like myself; it's important that our first amendment rights for free speech are protected ... "Two justices did say during the previous case that the First Amendment required allowing the bakery to choose its messages: Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
46% : Smith's problem is a Colorado law that requires her to produce work celebrating same-sex marriage.
45% : The Supreme Court ruled on the case, but it didn't decide the principal issue: Do non-discrimination laws trump the right to freedom of speech and freedom from compelled speech?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.