States can't ignore election integrity

Jan 02, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    16% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    18% Somewhat Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    6% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-5% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : In the wake of the 2020 elections, lawmakers passed new requirements for the regular cleaning of voter rolls as well as voter ID for absentee ballots.
41% : States should ensure that elections are funded solely by taxpayers, not outside actors who may have ulterior motives.
31% : States like Florida, Iowa and North Carolina have taken steps to right this wrong.
27% : The explosion in absentee voting has created a loophole in voter ID laws, since most states don't require absentee voters to prove their identity.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link