Suffolk public campaign finance bill dies a disingenuous death
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : But public financing makes taxpayers fund candidates they might despise -- folks who support fascism, communism and witchcraft, or alternately, other ideals currently despised in some corners, like kindness, courtesy, courage and nobility.47% : Legislators who argue the main reason for killing public campaign financing is the need to shift the $2.6 million to renewing the ShotSpotter program and addressing shortages of 911 dispatchers and Department of Social Services caseworkers are being disingenuous.
41% : "If I don't want to fund this candidate personally, why should I have to do it through taxes?"
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.