Law & Crime Article Rating

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case of Christian Web Designer Who Claims She's Being 'Forced' by State Government to Promote Same-Sex Marriage

Feb 22, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -4% Center

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -4% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : Whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent, contrary to the artist's sincerely held religious beliefs, violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.2.
47% : But the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) requires her to create custom websites celebrating same-sex marriage and prohibits her statement -- even though Colorado stipulates that she "work[s] with all people regardless of ... sexual orientation."
47% : That case held that city adoption agencies violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment when they refused to contract with a Catholic adoption organization because of the latter's refusal to "certify same-sex couples as foster parents."
47% : Masterpiece, of course, is a reference to Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the 2018 case that held states must apply anti-discrimination laws in a neutral manner and could not exhibit "clear and impermissible hostility" when seeking to enforce those laws against individuals whose "sincere religious beliefs" were seemingly at odds with the state's anti-discrimination goals.
46% : According to an order, the court only wishes to consider the first question, namely "[w]hether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment."
45% : The record contains no evidence that anyone has asked the Company to create a website for a same-sex wedding; that Colorado has threatened enforcement; or that any future wedding website would convey a message that would be attributed to the Company.
43% : Whether a commercial provider has standing, and its claim is ripe, when it has not entered the market, has no customers, has not created a product, and has not shown a credible threat of enforcement under the challenged law?2.
39% : The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday agreed to hear a case involving a Christian website designer and her company, an LLC, who claim they are being "forced" by the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act to support same-sex marriage.
36% : First, 303 Creative LLC and its owner (together, the Company) fail to show that it faces a credible threat of enforcement under the Act.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link