Supreme Court justices attack each other over gay wedding case

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : Because the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act prohibits businesses from openly discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation, among other factors, Smith argued that the state law violated her free speech and religious rights under the First Amendment.
54% : It also comes a day after Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson sparred in another ruling on affirmative action policies in college admissions.
39% :"The opinion of the Court is, quite literally, a notice that reads: 'Some servicesmay be denied to same-sex couples,'" she wrote in her dissent, which was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Jackson.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.