Supreme Court justices question affirmative action admission policies

  • Bias Rating

    12% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    34% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

53% : By the end of the first session of arguments, a majority of the justices seemed ready to rule against the use of affirmative action in admissions policies and the second set of arguments seemed to further cement this view.
51% : "No one is automatically getting in because race is being used," she said to the attorney for Students for Fair Admissions, adding: "Why does having race as a factor harm your members?"Catholic colleges as a group weighed in on the two cases, urging the court to uphold affirmative action in admissions.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link