Supreme Court Sends Message with Narrow Standing Holding in Murthy v. Missouri

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

44% : For instance, Justice Alito claims that the decision here is incompatible with Massachusetts v. EPA because the Court found standing to sue the Environmental Protection Agency even though "no one could say that the relief sought -- reconsideration by the EPA of its decision not to regulate the emission of greenhouse gases -- would actually remedy the Commonwealth's alleged injuries, such as the loss of land due to rising sea levels.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.