Texts Show How Officers Lost Track of Trump Gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
36% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-18% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : "The "kid" referenced in the text would be lying dead less than 30 minutes later -- killed by a single shot from a Secret Service sniper, but not until he'd rattled off at least three shots at Trump in his rally's first minutes.43% : An officer climbed toward Crooks on the rooftop, mere seconds before he opened fire on Trump, but dropped from the roof's ledge after Crooks aimed his rifle at him.
39% : The Times reported he'd then positioned himself below a local sniper team who who were upstairs in a warehouse owned by AGR International -- the very building where Crooks eventually perched himself atop of and fired at Trump from.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.