The great danger is that this time, Trumpism starts making sense | Randeep Ramesh
- Bias Rating
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-36% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
7% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : However, in a sign that price controls were becoming mainstream in national politics, Trump promised to cap credit card interest rates.50% : Since then, two US presidencies have acknowledged the need to rebuild an economy that supports blue-collar workers affected by free trade, immigration and globalisation.
46% : Trump's assault on free trade and immigration aimed at its destruction."
45% : Trump presents free trade and open borders as threats to US prosperity, advocating for strict controls that admit only goods and people aligned with American interests.
45% : While centrist Democrats support corporate interests by blocking progressive reforms, Trump aligns directly with billionaires, promoting a culture where justice serves the wealthy, prejudice is trivialised and power diminishes equality.
40% : Both Trump and Harris gauged voters' indifference to near-trillion-dollar deficits, promising on the campaign trail to protect social security and Medicare.
35% : After the crash but before Trump, the Tea Party was a rightwing populist movement frustrated by globalisation yet anti-worker in orientation.
32% : But in 2016, the rise of Trump on the right and Bernie Sanders on the left highlighted a real shift, as neoliberalism's grip loosened, making space for once marginalised ideas.
29% : Whether Trump can mobilise popular discontent over social and economic inequalities without alienating the oligarchs who support him remains an open question.
17% : Biden sought to cultivate a green economy, while Trump promoted fossil fuels so aggressively that it bordered on self-parody.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.