The leaked dossier on JD Vance is revealing in all the things it doesn't say | Moira Donegan

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

33% : But the salience of the comments also signals something else that has changed this election: Trump no longer solely sets the terms of the conversation.
25% : But Trump has lost his juice.Which brings us to the other reason why the dossier may not have contained many of Vance's most potent vulnerabilities: perhaps Trump's staff overlooked them because they assumed that they would be able to generate the narrative on their own, assuming that it was they, and they alone, who would dictate what the media covered and what the public cared about.
21% : Trump has been unable to get a nickname to stick to Kamala; he has been unsuccessful in his efforts to generate vulgar distractions about her sexual history or the authenticity of her racial identity.
7% : Instead, the dossier was largely focused on comments by Vance that make him vulnerable with an audience of one: that is, his past negative statements about Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.