The New York Times can't make a case for Harris -- so here's why I'm...
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-33% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-15% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
69% : Fortunately, making the case for Trump is much easier.60% : By 10 points, the Journal writes, respondents say Trump would better handle the economy.
55% : Out of pure hatred for anything Trump did, Biden and Harris ended those policies and sent a "come and get it signal" to the world.
55% : Given his record and the way the world is unraveling, Trump should be heading toward a landside.
43% : Still, as the campaign enters the final stretch, Trump should remember why he thought it important to tone down the rhetoric.
42% : Trump built some of the wall he promised and developed tough policies, including the "remain in Mexico" program that required asylum seekers to wait there until hearings were held.
40% : The culture wars are the third big reason why I want Trump elected.
37% : By 48% to 33%, they say Trump would better handle the Israel-Hamas war.
32% : The language many use about Trump and his followers is part of why he was the would-be assassins' target.
31% : City and state taxpayers across the nation are being staggered by the costs, terror watch lists are swamped and officials lost track of more than 300,000 children who crossed the border without a parent, according to the Department of Homeland SecurityForeign policy is the second reason why I'm voting for Trump, and again the Journal finds the public agrees he did a better job.
26% : A dozen blue states tried to keep Trump off this year's ballot, and the former president is the first in history to face prosecution after leaving office.
25% : And if Trump wins, alienating large numbers of people with insults will make it harder to get anything done.
10% : The fundamental difference is that Trump understands the concept of peace through strength, while Biden and Harris see American power mostly as a shameful relic -- which flashes weakness to dictators.
5% : If you were an undecided voter, especially a woman, would Trump calling Harris or Liz Cheney dumb" or "stupid" make you vote for him -- or against him?
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.