The end of Title 42
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
96% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : I know on the San Diego side , the migrant shelters have been waiting for CBP to just tell them like , hey , we expect X number of people to to go to your facilities every day.60% : S1: And CBP , of course , refers to Customs and Border Protection.
54% : S1: And now let's talk about CBP one.
52% : But there will also be a new set of restrictions to asylum.
50% : Now there's new rules , as San Diego officials expect to see a lot more migrants and asylum seekers arriving at the southern border.
50% : They wanted to go to the legal port of entry and ask for asylum and wait in line to do it.
49% : That's the app where people are supposed to apply for asylum now or at least begin the process there.
48% : They spend a lot on border patrol and all these different methods that get people in detention and into the immigration court system.
47% : S1: And Gustavo , I remember from some of our previous conversations when we talked about this buildup of migrants on the southern border waiting to come in , You would talk to people that said that we shouldn't necessarily be surprised by this because it's sort of a self made issue.
46% : I mean , it just to to talk about the shift a little bit , like since World War Two , which is sort of where our modern asylum system comes from , after the US turned away Jewish asylum seekers , the asylum laws in this country have allowed migrants to enter the country legally and still be eligible for asylum.
45% : Generally speaking , it means that migrants will be vetted given a chance to request asylum , go through a brief interview and those who can establish a legitimate reason for having it can continue on to the process and those who don't will be deported.
45% : I'll be there looking at where migrants line up , how they are treated by Border Patrol , whether they're turned away or not , how Tijuana reacts , because the last thing the city of Tijuana wants is another migrant camp like they had last year at the border crossing.
44% : But it creates this presumption of ineligibility for asylum if migrants don't apply for asylum in a third country that they pass to before getting to the US.
40% : S1: Part of these policies is federal immigration officials will generally presume everyone entering the country illegally is not eligible for asylum.
38% : This new rule is a big shift that people will be presumed ineligible for asylum unless they make an appointment through a mobile app.
36% : The last couple of years in Title 42 specifically has kind of shifted that narrative from asylum , going to being a responsibility to becoming a burden.
35% : They see it as restricting people's legal right to asylum and really President Joe Biden turning back.
34% : It's been called the Ticketmaster of Asylum because of how glitchy and and unfair it seems to be.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.