KPBS Article Rating

The end of Title 42

May 12, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    94% Extremely Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    96% Extremely Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -24% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

62% : I know on the San Diego side , the migrant shelters have been waiting for CBP to just tell them like , hey , we expect X number of people to to go to your facilities every day.
60% : S1: And CBP , of course , refers to Customs and Border Protection.
54% : S1: And now let's talk about CBP one.
52% : But there will also be a new set of restrictions to asylum.
50% : Now there's new rules , as San Diego officials expect to see a lot more migrants and asylum seekers arriving at the southern border.
50% : They wanted to go to the legal port of entry and ask for asylum and wait in line to do it.
49% : That's the app where people are supposed to apply for asylum now or at least begin the process there.
48% : They spend a lot on border patrol and all these different methods that get people in detention and into the immigration court system.
47% : S1: And Gustavo , I remember from some of our previous conversations when we talked about this buildup of migrants on the southern border waiting to come in , You would talk to people that said that we shouldn't necessarily be surprised by this because it's sort of a self made issue.
46% : I mean , it just to to talk about the shift a little bit , like since World War Two , which is sort of where our modern asylum system comes from , after the US turned away Jewish asylum seekers , the asylum laws in this country have allowed migrants to enter the country legally and still be eligible for asylum.
45% : Generally speaking , it means that migrants will be vetted given a chance to request asylum , go through a brief interview and those who can establish a legitimate reason for having it can continue on to the process and those who don't will be deported.
45% : I'll be there looking at where migrants line up , how they are treated by Border Patrol , whether they're turned away or not , how Tijuana reacts , because the last thing the city of Tijuana wants is another migrant camp like they had last year at the border crossing.
44% : But it creates this presumption of ineligibility for asylum if migrants don't apply for asylum in a third country that they pass to before getting to the US.
40% : S1: Part of these policies is federal immigration officials will generally presume everyone entering the country illegally is not eligible for asylum.
38% : This new rule is a big shift that people will be presumed ineligible for asylum unless they make an appointment through a mobile app.
36% : The last couple of years in Title 42 specifically has kind of shifted that narrative from asylum , going to being a responsibility to becoming a burden.
35% : They see it as restricting people's legal right to asylum and really President Joe Biden turning back.
34% : It's been called the Ticketmaster of Asylum because of how glitchy and and unfair it seems to be.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link