PJ Media Article Rating

There's Something Odd About the Harris Campaign's Response to Trump's McDonald's Visit

  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    -48% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    -12% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

19% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

75% : When a customer asked Trump if he appreciated McDonald's more from the experience, Trump said he did.
72% : The campaign should have seen it coming -- after all, Trump had been hinting for weeks about working a shift at McDonald's, and it truly became one of the most brilliant political maneuvers of this election cycle.
71% : "Well, I do appreciate it; maybe a little bit more, yeah," Trump said.
58% : Trump worked the fryer and drive-thru at a McDonald's in Bucks County, a key swing area in Pennsylvania, and drew massive crowds for it.
55% : The event appeared to genuinely humble Trump.
38% : If you were advising Harris, the obvious move would have been to tell her, "Give us some proof that you actually worked at McDonald's, and we can easily upstage Trump or at least take the wind out of his stunt."
34% : It would have been much more effective if Kamala herself responded by saying, "Trump pretended to work at a McDonald's; I actually worked there, yada, yada, yada.
32% : "This was an undeniable victory for Trump, and it thoroughly blindsided the Harris-Walz campaign.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link