The Senate, House voted to protect same-sex marriage. Here's what it means in Indiana.
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-16% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : Following the Senate and the House's historic votes on same-sex marriage protections, the legislation now heads to President Joe Biden's desk for a signature.59% : The Respect for Marriage, or RFMA, would ensure interstate recognition of same-sex marriages already performed or those performed in other states.
55% : That means, if a same-sex couple from Indiana would travel to Illinois to get married, Indiana would have to honor that marriage.
50% : The bill would not, however, require Indiana or others states to allow same-sex marriages.
45% : In the House, six Indiana Republicans voted against same-sex marriage protections and the two Democrats voted in favor.
44% : Last week, 12 Republicans, including a Hoosier senator, joined the Democratic caucus to pass the same-sex marriage bill, which would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife".
44% : "The difference that the new federal Respect for Marriage Act makes is that under those circumstances Indiana could go back to prohibiting same-sex marriages from taking place in Indiana," Sanders said.
44% : "What it could not do in the future because of the new Respect for Marriage Act is to deny recognition to same-sex marriages that come from other states."
43% : In Indiana, a state law still on the books bans same-sex marriage.
42% : In an opinion piece for IndyStar, Young said same-sex couples want to enjoy the same legal protections as heterosexual couples and the bill would bring both groups closer to dignity and respect.
41% : He also reassured his voting base that religious freedoms would not be impacted by its passing.
38% : Young voted in favor of protections for same-sex marriage while Braun voted against.
36% : When he first ran for senator in 2018, he also told IndyStar he believes in traditional marriage and is against abortion as a matter of his Christian faith.
27% : Steve Sanders, a constitutional law professor at Indiana University and expert on same-sex marriage, said Congress would not have the power to tell states to perform same-sex marriages under the RFMA.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.