This Election's Surprising Bright Spot for Progressives Is a Very Big Deal
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-6% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
44% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : This shifting dynamic is perhaps most evident in North Carolina, a swing state that Trump carried by about 3 points.59% : On Election Day, Bolden and Thomas each won by more than 20 points, with backing from outside groups, including Planned Parenthood and the ACLU.
57% : Left-leaning judges pulled off wins in states where Trump won an even bigger margin.
55% : Abortion surely played a role: State courts have immense leeway to expand or curtail reproductive rights in a post-Roe v. Wade world, and liberal judges have perfected the art of running on abortion.
52% : A similar strategy in another battleground, Michigan, helped progressives grow their majority on the state Supreme Court this year even as Trump carried the state.
49% : By doing so, they may have gained an edge among the Democratic Party's current coalition of educated, high-propensity voters, who will take part in down-ballot races that many Trump supporters seem to ignore -- apparently even when Trump is on the ticket.
48% : Abortion surely helped to activate voters in a post-Roe landscape where state Supreme Courts have the final word on reproductive rights.
45% : Running as a champion of women's right to bodily autonomy doesn't only work in purple states: It also paid off in Montana, which Trump carried by about 20 points.
41% : Sullivan, by contrast, served as a public defender, and ran as an outsider and a populist with an interest in criminal justice reform.
37% : It certainly helped that many North Carolinians cast their vote for Trump but skipped the judicial race.
36% : And the left probably benefited from "bullet voters" -- those who showed up to support Trump then ignored the other races.
24% : Trump may entrench a conservative majority in the federal judiciary for generations.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.