Law & Crime Article Rating

Trump cites Judge Cannon's dismantling of Mar-a-Lago case to seek $100M in damages from DOJ

Aug 12, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -12% Somewhat Liberal

  • Reliability

    75% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -34% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-51% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

36% : "In alleging damages to Trump, the tort claim memo said that the DOJ and FBI's "oppression, wantonness, and reckless disregard of President Trump's rights" in his case caused him "actual harm" to the tune of $15 million in legal bills, tacking on to the "legal costs of over $60 million per year since shortly after he left office," according to a footnote at the end of the filing.
35% : Nevertheless, as the DOJ-authorized appeal of the dismissal remains pending, Trump assigns blame to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray for engaging in "clear dereliction of constitutional principles, inconsistent standards as applied to the prospective plaintiff, and a clear intent to engage in political persecution" by pushing ahead with the Mar-a-Lago search without his "consent.
21% : A memo attached to a notice of a Trump claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim filed by attorney Daniel Z. Epstein, alleges the "tortious acts against the President are rooted in intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process" stemming from the Mar-a-Lago search, describing that as "highly offensive to a reasonable person."Notably, before the Trump-appointed jurist jettisoned the case, Cannon wrote that Trump had not "meaningfully challenge[d]" probable cause and alleged warrant "omissions," and her subsequent dismissal of the Espionage Act indictment on Appointment Clause grounds meant that Trump's motion to dismiss on grounds of selective or vindictive prosecution was rejected as moot (i.e., was never decided on the merits) along with other pending motions.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link