Trump's Economic Plans Don't Add Up
- Bias Rating
44% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-40% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
1% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
40% : They don't -- and can't -- provide a full analysis of the likely economic impacts, in significant part because Trump hasn't provided enough detail to estimate them.37% : And Trump pushes out new ideas virtually every day, with no underlying analysis of their impacts, making it even harder to keep track of his proposals.
35% : Just this week, Trump talked about capping credit card interest rates at 10 percent, a proposal the Wall Street Journal editorial board compared to previous proposals by Bernie Sanders.
32% : We do know Trump supports extending and deepening regressive tax cuts favoring the wealthy and corporations, levying tariffs that will raise prices for all Americans and possibly start a trade war, and disrupting the labor market by deporting millions of immigrants.
28% : Trump says those tariffs would offset the lost tax revenue, but Wharton laconically notes that "key implementation details...are missing," including the impact on prices and retaliation from trading partners.
27% : But, just as we saw this week on the credit card interest proposal, Trump has no interest in specifying details of what his proposals would look like.
21% : New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, who has covered Trump for years, recently said journalism is "not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he (Trump) does or speaks as incoherently as he often does."
17% : Attempts to engage on policy specifics are washed away when Trump changes the subject, or distorts and falsifies issues repeatedly.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.