Trump's First Defeat
- Bias Rating
-38% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-46% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-12% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : The fact that Gaetz, like Trump, has a personal vendetta against the Justice Department seemed to be his main credential for the job.44% : The president-elect likes to take a gamble, even if he sometimes loses, but as I argued last week, the presence of so many unqualified picks might perversely make it easier for some of them to get through -- after all, the Senate couldn't reject them all, right?Read: The perverse logic of Trump's nomination circusGaetz's quick exit shows that Senate Republicans aren't willing to accept literally anyone who Trump throws their way, and the fact that they were able to send that message so quickly suggests just how deep their reservations were.
42% : If the rejection is a sign of weakness for Trump, it is also one for his vice president-elect, Senator J. D. Vance.
37% : Before Trump chose Gaetz, he reportedly concluded that other contenders simply didn't have what he wanted in an attorney general, according to The New York Times.
36% : Trump doesn't appear to have bothered to vet Gaetz in any serious way before nominating him, but all of this was known.
31% : It seems unlikely that Trump intended either of these -- he doesn't usually play to lose -- but that could be the effect.
20% : Just two days ago, Trump was insisting he had no second thoughts about picking Gaetz.
17% : Alternatively, Gaetz could end up looking like a sacrificial pick to save the others, or like a stalking horse for Trump to appoint someone else at DOJ.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.