Trump's Opportunity in Lebanon
- Bias Rating
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
52% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-5% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
73% : In another sign of how Lebanon may be given special attention in Trump 2.0, the president-elect granted an exclusive interview to the Lebanese MTV channel in the final weeks before the elections, promising that things would turn out well for the people of the country under his watch.62% : Trump attaching a special importance to Lebanon would be consistent with his family-influenced foreign policy approach in the Middle East.
56% : Pursuing such an approach is almost certain to have a better chance at success than the maximum-pressure campaign waged during Trump 1.0.
53% : Given how Hezbollah represents a vital national interest for Iran, a reduced focus on undermining the Lebanese Shiite movement could be an important confidence-building measure that may help Trump bring Tehran to the negotiating table to discuss a nuclear deal and possibly even a wider regional understanding.
52% : Given these dynamics, there exists a strong case for Trump to adjust American policy regarding Lebanon.
50% : His elder son-in-law Jared Kushner played an outsized role in the Abraham Accords during Trump 1.0, by which the U.S. successfully brokered the normalization of ties between Israel and several Arab states.
48% : More importantly, an end to the war in Lebanon could be pivotal to reaching a new agreement with Iran, something Trump has openly declared he wishes to pursue.
39% : Nevertheless, as observers have pointed out, it is likely that Trump and not his aides will be running the show this time.
37% : This would allow Trump 2.0 to focus on more pressing issues like competition with China.
34% : (Trump has reportedly greenlit a ceasefire proposal between Lebanon and Israel, although, according to Lebanese media, sticking points remain.)
25% : Trump has made more than one gesture to this effect, raising hopes that his return to the White House may end the suffering in the war-ravaged country.
24% : For such an endeavor to succeed, however, Trump would need to abandon Washington's long-standing anti-Hezbollah Lebanon policy.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.