Trump talk of 'special master' a distraction. Documents speak for themselves.

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : The Fourth Amendment exists to protect us from unlawful government searches and seizures.
56% :Which now brings us to question of "sealing" or "unsealing" the affidavit of law enforcement in support of the search warrant application.
51% : The Fourth Amendment reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
48% :That's right - the search warrant actually protected the former president of the United States by ensuring that a neutral and detached judge first determined that it was more likely than not that evidence of illegality would be found at Mar-a-Lago before law enforcement could search the premises.
47% : And before that judge or magistrate signs the search warrant, that judge or magistrate - who is "neutral and detached," must be satisfied that law enforcement has provided first-hand proof that it is more likely than not that evidence of illegality will be found in the place to be searched - what we call "probable cause."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.