PoliticusTulsi Gabbard Tried To Clean Up Trump's Arlington Scandal And It Didn't Go Great
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
20% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : She offered no proof that Trump had permission to film a campaign ad at Arlington.22% : Gabbard couldn't defend what Trump did.
20% : Trump thought that he was resetting the election narrative and boosting his campaign, but what he did was create a new scandal for himself.
14% : The whole stunt which was designed to make Trump look like a troops supporting patriot has backfired and demonstrated Trump's disrespect for the troops, the fallen, and the law.
6% : Trump put Tulsi Gabbard on CNN to clean up the aftermath of his Arlington National Cemetery scandal, and there were some problems.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.